Description

A simple control method was developed by Braun (2007) for cool storage systems having real-time pricing (RTP) of electricity and shown to yield annual operating costs that are within about 2% of those determined for optimal control. The primary goal of the work described in this paper was to evaluate the operating cost savings associated with employing the strategy developed by Braun (2007) as compared with using chiller-priority control. In addition, operating cost savings associated with employing ice storage in combination with RTP rates were evaluated for both the near-optimal and chiller-priority strategies. For a range of systems employing ice storage with RTP rates, the cost savings associated with the near-optimal strategy compared to chiller-priority control were found to be as high as 60% with typical savings between 25% and 30%. These savings are much more significant than savings associated with employing near-optimal control for cool storage systems when typical time-of-use utility rates are employed with demand charges. A similar level of savings was determined when comparing costs for the near-optimal control strategy applied to ice storage systems with costs for systems not employing cool storage. However, relatively small savings were determined for use of ice storage when chiller-priority control is utilized. In many situations, the use of storage with chiller-priority control can actually result in higher costs than without storage. It can be concluded that chiller-priority control should not be employed in combination with RTP rate structures for cool storage systems.

Units: I-P

Citation: ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 113, pt. 2

Product Details

Published:

2007

Number of Pages:

12

File Size:

1 file , 3.4 MB

Product Code(s):

D-LB-07-037